The Supreme Court on Friday (13.10.2023), raised serious concerns over the delays in the adoption process and the potential impact on both aspiring parents and children in need of loving homes. The remarks came from a bench comprising CJI DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala, and Justice Manoj Misra during the hearing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking the simplification of adoption procedures in the country, filed by "The Temple of Healing," a charitable trust.
Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Aishwarya Bhati requested additional time to file a response to the PIL, which prompted Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud to express his apprehension. He raised questions about the delays in the adoption process, highlighting that it has virtually come to a standstill, leaving couples waiting for years.
The CJI further emphasised on the effects of bureaucratic delays on individuals and families. He asserted–"
Suppose someone wants to adopt at 35, they get delayed and now they are 39, 40, they may feel that it is too late to adopt. Parental position changes. We understand that possibly there is an element of misuse that you are apprehending but why are you stalling adoptions? There are hundreds and thousands of children waiting for adoption.
ASG Bhati responded by highlighting that there had been issues in identifying children available for adoption, suggesting that the court may want to provide for two more weeks.
Dr. Piyush Saxena (petitioner-in-person) appeared for the Temple of Healing. He highlighted that as per Section 56(3) of the Juvenile Justice (JJ) Act, the JJ Act did not apply to adoptions carried out under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act (HAMA), 1956. He argued that on the ground level, children were not being adopted as the officers in-charge of adoption for juveniles were being "doubly cautious".
The figure of 4000 adoptions against a figure of 3.1 crore children waiting to be adopted – these are not my figures, these are the figures of Parliamentary committee of the Rajya Sabha," he said.
Reiterating his submission, Saxena stated–
CJI asked–
Ms Bhati, you tell us how many children are being adopted...
The bench then stated that it will go through the written submissions in a greater detail. Eventually, the bench told the ASG that she had to "sit with CARA" and explain the consequences of the delay.
The matter will now be taken up on next Friday.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday (February 27) came down heavily on Patanjali Ayurved for continuing to publish misleading advertisements regarding medicinal cures, despite making an assurance to the Court earlier in November last year that no such statements would be ...
The Supreme Court on Thursday launched ‘SuSwagatam’, a new initiative to generate entry passes online to help those who need to visit the court premises for various purposes. Chief Justice of India (CJI) D Y Chandrachud on Thursday announced the ...
Article 32 of the Constitution gives individuals the right to approach the Supreme Court if they feel their fundamental rights have been violated. Supreme Court on Tuesday deprecated the trend of the accused in money laundering cases using Article 32 ...
The Supreme Court, while granting custody of a minor child to the her aunt despite opposition from the father, held that the personal law or statute couldn't override the welfare of the child while deciding the custody of the child. ...
📢 Inheritance and Succession Laws for NRIs Understanding inheritance and succession laws is crucial for Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) to manage their assets and ensure smooth transfer to their heirs. Here's a concise guide to these laws for NRIs, including key ...
The Supreme Court Bench comprising Justice Aniruddha Bose and Justice Vikram Nath, has held that in order to attract the application of Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, which requires 6 months’ notice for termination of lease, ...