Insurance Companies Must Deal In A Bonafide & Fair Manner ;

Card image

Insurance Companies Must Deal In A Bonafide & Fair Manner ; Should Not Just Care For Its Own Profits : Supreme Court

By Admin |

The Supreme Court observed that an insurance is expected to deal with the insured in a bonafide and fair manner and should not just care for and cater to its own profits.

It is the duty of the insurance company to disclose all material facts within their knowledge since the obligation of good faith applies to both equally, the bench of Justices AS Bopanna and Sanjay Kumar observed.

In this case, the complainant, who had undertaken prawn cultivation in an extent of 100 acres, had obtained insurance coverage from an Insurance Company. There was a major outbreak of a bacterial disease called ‘White Spot Disease’ along the east coast of Andhra Pradesh, which led to mass mortality of prawns. He invoked the policy but the Insurance company repudiated the appellant’s claim in its entirety, on the ground that there was a breach by the complainant of the policy conditions, inasmuch as records were not maintained properly and accurately. NCDRC, disposing his complaint, assessed his total loss as ₹30,69,486.80. Dissatisfied with this order, the complainant approached the Apex Court.

At the outset, the court noted that that uberrima fides, i.e., good faith, is the requirement in a contract of insurance.

“It it is the fundamental principle of insurance law that utmost good faith must be observed by the contracting parties; that good faith forbids either party from non-disclosure of the facts which the party knows; and that the insured has a duty to disclose and similarly it is the duty of the insurance company to disclose all material facts within their knowledge since the obligation of good faith applies to both equally. This obligation and duty would rest on both parties not only at the inception of the contract of insurance but throughout its existence and even thereafter.”

 

The bench noted that the insurance company baldly brushed aside the Death Certificate dated 01.05.1995 furnished by the officials of the State Fisheries Department at Visakhapatnam.

“Merely because the contents thereof were not to its liking, the insurance company could not have ignored the same and swept it under the carpet. More so, as such certification was being made by impartial and independent bodies of significant stature and that, perhaps, was precisely the reason why the insurance company had attached such importance to it in its norms. In any event, it is not open to an insurance company to ignore or fail to act upon a certificate or document that it had itself called for from independent and impartial authorities, subject to just exceptions, merely because it is averse to it or to its detriment. Having undertaken to indemnify an insured against possible loss in specified situations, an insurance company is expected to make good on its promise in a bonafide and fair manner and not just care for and cater to its own profits

 

Allowing the appeal, the court ordered that a sum of ₹45,18,263.20 shall be remitted by the insurance company to the appellant, with simple interest thereon @ 10% from the date of the complaint till the date of realization, within six weeks.

Isnar Aqua Farms vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd

Insurance Law – Uberrima fides, i.e., good faith, is the requirement in a contract of insurance – It is not open to an insurance company to ignore or fail to act upon a certificate or document that it had itself called for from independent and impartial authorities, subject to just exceptions, merely because it is averse to it or to its detriment. Having undertaken to indemnify an insured against possible loss in specified situations, an insurance company is expected to make good on its promise in a bonafide and fair manner and not just care for and cater to its own profit – It is the fundamental principle of insurance law that utmost good faith must be observed by the contracting parties; that good faith forbids either party from non-disclosure of the facts which the party knows; and that the insured has a duty to disclose and similarly it is the duty of the insurance company to disclose all material facts within their knowledge since the obligation of good faith applies to both equally. This obligation and duty would rest on both parties not only at the inception of the contract of insurance but throughout its existence and even thereafter. (Para 12-13)

Source

Latest News Latest Supreme Court

Latest Posts

Card image

Personal Law Or Statute Can't Override Welfare Of Child' Supreme Court Grants Custody Of...

The Supreme Court while granting custody of a minor child to the her aunt despite opposition from the father held that the personal law or statute couldn't override the welfare of the child while deciding the custody of the child...

Card image

Personal Data Protection Bill Implications for Businesses and Individuals...

The Personal Data Protection Bill PDP Bill is a transformative piece of legislation aimed at safeguarding personal data and ensuring privacy in India Here rsquo s a concise overview of its key provisions and implications for businesses and individuals Key...

Card image

Motor Accident Claims Social Status Of Deceased To Be Considered If There s No...

The Supreme Court has reinstated an award originally granted by the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal MACT The apex court expressed disappointment over the approach taken by the High Court in evaluating the evidence and reinstated the MACT rsquo s verdict...

Card image

SC refuses to entertain plea for survey of Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah premises...

The Supreme Court Friday refused to entertain a plea by 'Shri Krishna Janambhoomi Mukti Nirman Trust' seeking a survey of the Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah mosque premises in Mathura to determine whether it was built on a pre-existing Hindu temple The apex...

Card image

EVMs Non-Tamperable Demand For VVPAT Verification Regressive Election Commission Tells Supreme Court...

Ahead of the Lok Sabha elections the Election Commission of India ECI has staunchly defended electronic voting machines EVM as lsquo non-tamperable rsquo both owing to technological measures and strict administrative and security procedures designed by the commission In a...

Card image

Be Vigilant Before Invoking Stringent Laws Like SC-ST Act Supreme Court Reminds Police Officers...

In a recent case the Supreme Court reminded police officers of their duty to be vigilant before invoking provisions of stringent laws such as the SC-ST Prevention of Atrocities Act stating that officers must be satisfied that the provisions apply...

EOS Chambers of Law

Speak With Our
Experts Today!

Get a Appointment
EOS Chambers of Law