Insurance Companies Must Deal In A Bonafide & Fair Manner ;

Card image

Insurance Companies Must Deal In A Bonafide & Fair Manner ; Should Not Just Care For Its Own Profits : Supreme Court

By Admin |

The Supreme Court observed that an insurance is expected to deal with the insured in a bonafide and fair manner and should not just care for and cater to its own profits.

It is the duty of the insurance company to disclose all material facts within their knowledge since the obligation of good faith applies to both equally, the bench of Justices AS Bopanna and Sanjay Kumar observed.

In this case, the complainant, who had undertaken prawn cultivation in an extent of 100 acres, had obtained insurance coverage from an Insurance Company. There was a major outbreak of a bacterial disease called ‘White Spot Disease’ along the east coast of Andhra Pradesh, which led to mass mortality of prawns. He invoked the policy but the Insurance company repudiated the appellant’s claim in its entirety, on the ground that there was a breach by the complainant of the policy conditions, inasmuch as records were not maintained properly and accurately. NCDRC, disposing his complaint, assessed his total loss as ₹30,69,486.80. Dissatisfied with this order, the complainant approached the Apex Court.

At the outset, the court noted that that uberrima fides, i.e., good faith, is the requirement in a contract of insurance.

“It it is the fundamental principle of insurance law that utmost good faith must be observed by the contracting parties; that good faith forbids either party from non-disclosure of the facts which the party knows; and that the insured has a duty to disclose and similarly it is the duty of the insurance company to disclose all material facts within their knowledge since the obligation of good faith applies to both equally. This obligation and duty would rest on both parties not only at the inception of the contract of insurance but throughout its existence and even thereafter.”

 

The bench noted that the insurance company baldly brushed aside the Death Certificate dated 01.05.1995 furnished by the officials of the State Fisheries Department at Visakhapatnam.

“Merely because the contents thereof were not to its liking, the insurance company could not have ignored the same and swept it under the carpet. More so, as such certification was being made by impartial and independent bodies of significant stature and that, perhaps, was precisely the reason why the insurance company had attached such importance to it in its norms. In any event, it is not open to an insurance company to ignore or fail to act upon a certificate or document that it had itself called for from independent and impartial authorities, subject to just exceptions, merely because it is averse to it or to its detriment. Having undertaken to indemnify an insured against possible loss in specified situations, an insurance company is expected to make good on its promise in a bonafide and fair manner and not just care for and cater to its own profits

 

Allowing the appeal, the court ordered that a sum of ₹45,18,263.20 shall be remitted by the insurance company to the appellant, with simple interest thereon @ 10% from the date of the complaint till the date of realization, within six weeks.

Isnar Aqua Farms vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd

Insurance Law – Uberrima fides, i.e., good faith, is the requirement in a contract of insurance – It is not open to an insurance company to ignore or fail to act upon a certificate or document that it had itself called for from independent and impartial authorities, subject to just exceptions, merely because it is averse to it or to its detriment. Having undertaken to indemnify an insured against possible loss in specified situations, an insurance company is expected to make good on its promise in a bonafide and fair manner and not just care for and cater to its own profit – It is the fundamental principle of insurance law that utmost good faith must be observed by the contracting parties; that good faith forbids either party from non-disclosure of the facts which the party knows; and that the insured has a duty to disclose and similarly it is the duty of the insurance company to disclose all material facts within their knowledge since the obligation of good faith applies to both equally. This obligation and duty would rest on both parties not only at the inception of the contract of insurance but throughout its existence and even thereafter. (Para 12-13)

Source

Latest News Latest Supreme Court

Latest Posts

Card image

Companies Act Decision To Allot Additional Shares Cannot Be Set Aside Merely Because Promoters...

The Supreme Court has upheld the largely disproportionate allotment of rights share in favour of one group of shareholders of a private limited company substantially increasing its shareholding percentage in the company over other group of shareholders The bench comprisingJustices...

Card image

AI Data Protection and Cyber crime Navigating Through the Nexus...

It was the dawn of the Digital Revolution in the latter half of th century that started to reshape the world But with the advent of AI data protection and cybersecurity have become paramount concerns for individuals businesses and governments...

Card image

Why Is CARA Delaying Adoption Process Supreme Court Calls For Prompt Action To Benefit...

The Supreme Court on Friday raised serious concerns over the delays in the adoption process and the potential impact on both aspiring parents and children in need of loving homes The remarks came from a bench comprising CJI DY...

Card image

Retired Employees Can t Claim Benefit Of Subsequent Govt Decision To Increase Retirement Age...

The Supreme Court has dismissed a petition filed by a group of teachers in Homeopathic Medical Colleges in Kerala seeking increase of their retirement age from years to years at par with the teachers of other Medical Colleges The...

Card image

An In-Depth Look at Environmental and Sustainability Law...

In today's rapidly changing world environmental and sustainability law has become a cornerstone of global legal practices With increasing awareness of climate change resource depletion and environmental degradation these laws are essential for promoting sustainable development and protecting our planet...

Card image

Be Vigilant Before Invoking Stringent Laws Like SC-ST Act Supreme Court Reminds Police Officers...

In a recent case the Supreme Court reminded police officers of their duty to be vigilant before invoking provisions of stringent laws such as the SC-ST Prevention of Atrocities Act stating that officers must be satisfied that the provisions apply...

EOS Chambers of Law

Speak With Our
Experts Today!

Get a Appointment
EOS Chambers of Law