Companies Act – Decision To Allot Additional Shares Cannot

Card image

Companies Act – Decision To Allot Additional Shares Cannot Be Set Aside Merely Because Promoters Have Also Benefited: Supreme Court

By Admin |

The Supreme Court has upheld the largely disproportionate allotment of rights share in favour of one group of shareholders of a private limited company, substantially increasing its shareholding percentage in the company over other group of shareholders.
The bench comprising
Justices K.M. Joseph and B.V. Nagarathna
found that the increase in the appellant- H.M. Patel Group’s shareholding from 30.80% to 63.58% of the paid-up share capital of the private company, was the result of the other shareholder-group’s refusal to apply for the additional shares, despite being given the opportunity. Thus, the allotment of fresh shares could not be characterized as oppressive, the court ruled.

The court held that after the Board of Directors had resolved to allot additional shares to the existing shareholders in the ratio of 1:1, while also giving them the option to apply for more or lesser number of shares than they were entitled to, the members of the H.M. Patel Group had applied for a greater number of shares. The shareholders constituting the other shareholders’ group, however, did not apply for the same.

The court thus ruled that there was no defect in the allotment of additional shares after the authorized share capital of the company was increased by a resolution passed in the Extraordinary General Meeting of the shareholders. The top court thus set aside the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) where it had ruled that the distribution of the additional shares was ‘defective’. The Tribunal had directed the allotment of additional shares to all the existing shareholders of the company in proportion to their shareholding.

The Apex Court noted that the members of the H.M. Patel Group were members of the Board of Directors at the time the decision to increase the authorized share capital and issue fresh shares was taken. It held that though Section 81(3) of Companies Act, 1956 expressly exempts a private limited company from the purview of Section 81, which deals with further issue of capital; however, notwithstanding the same, the conduct of the Directors is to be judged on a higher yardstick.

The court, however, remarked that the fact that the Directors may also benefit from a decision taken primarily with the intention to promote the interest of the Company, cannot vitiate the decision. Thus, even though the Directors who constituted the said shareholders’ group, benefited and made a gain from the implementation of a decision taken primarily with a view to safeguard the interest of the Company, it cannot by itself render the decision vulnerable to attack.
Source

Latest Supreme Court

Latest Posts

Card image

Navigating Real Estate Challenges A Solicitor's Insight...

Introduction In the intricate world of real estate consumers often find themselves entangled in a web of complexities that demand legal acumen and guidance As a solicitor passionate about serving my clients I feel compelled to shed light on the...

Card image

CJI DY Chandrachud Cautions About Artificial Intelligence Says It Can Make Biased Decisions Based...

Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachudrecently spoke on how no technology is neutral and how it can reflect human values when deployed in the real world The CJI spoke on how one must ponder the human and societal values...

Card image

Inheritance and Succession Laws for NRIs...

Inheritance and Succession Laws for NRIs Understanding inheritance and succession laws is crucial for Non-Resident Indians NRIs to manage their assets and ensure smooth transfer to their heirs Here's a concise guide to these laws for NRIs including key...

Card image

Retired Employees Can t Claim Benefit Of Subsequent Govt Decision To Increase Retirement Age...

The Supreme Court has dismissed a petition filed by a group of teachers in Homeopathic Medical Colleges in Kerala seeking increase of their retirement age from years to years at par with the teachers of other Medical Colleges The...

Card image

Delhi Riots SC Dismisses Delhi Police s Pleas Against HC Verdicts Granting Bail To...

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the pleas filed by the Delhi Police against the bail granted to three student activists in the North East Delhi riots case A bench of nbsp Justices S K Kaul and A Amanullah nbsp...

Card image

Understanding Indian Constitutional Laws A Brief Overview...

Introduction Indian Constitutional Law is the backbone of the country's legal system laying down the framework for governance rights and duties of citizens and the functioning of various institutions Enshrined in the Constitution of India adopted on January...

EOS Chambers of Law

Speak With Our
Experts Today!

Get a Appointment
EOS Chambers of Law