Be Vigilant Before Invoking Stringent Laws Like SC-ST Act :

Card image

Be Vigilant Before Invoking Stringent Laws Like SC-ST Act : Supreme Court ‘Reminds’ Police Officers

By Team EOS |

In a recent case, the Supreme Court reminded police officers of their duty to be vigilant before invoking provisions of stringent laws such as the SC-ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, stating that officers must be satisfied that the provisions apply to the specific case at hand.
However, the court made clear that this was not to dilute the applicability of such laws, but only to remind officers not to mechanically apply them without reference to the factual position.

The bench of Justices Dinesh Maheshwari and Ahsanuddin Amanullah observed.

“This Court would indicate that the officers, who institute an FIR, based on any complaint, are duty bound to be vigilant before invoking any provision of a very stringent statute, like the SC/ST Act, which imposes serious penal consequences on the concerned accused. The officer has to be satisfied that the provisions he seeks to invoke prima facie apply to the case at hand. We clarify that our remarks, in no manner, are to dilute the applicability of special/stringent statutes, but only to remind the police not to mechanically apply the law, dehors reference to the factual position.”

The case itself involved an appeal filed by a construction company managing director challenging an FIR registered against him under the SC-ST Act, which the court deemed to be frivolous, vexatious, and oppressive.

The Supreme Court noted that the dispute underlying the FIR was essentially civil in nature and appeared to be motivated by malafide, as it was raised only after the land in question had been developed and apartments sold to other allottees.

The  court ruled:

“What is evincible from the extant case-law is that this Court has been consistent in interfering in such matters where purely civil disputes, more often than not, relating to land and/or money are given the colour of criminality, only for the purposes of exerting extra-judicial pressure on the party concerned, which, we reiterate, is nothing but abuse of the process of the court. In the present case, there is a huge, and quite frankly, unexplained delay of over 60 years in initiating dispute with regard to the ownership of the land in question, and the criminal case has been lodged only after failure to obtain relief in the civil suits, coupled with denial of relief in the interim therein to the respondent no.2/her family members. It is evident that resort was now being had to criminal proceedings which, in the considered opinion of this Court, is with ulterior motives, for oblique reasons and is a clear case of vengeance.

The Court would also note that even if the allegations are taken to be true on their face value, it is not discernible that any offence can be said to have been made out under the SC/ST Act against the appellant. The complaint and FIR are frivolous, vexatious and oppressive.”

Read More

Latest Supreme Court

Latest Posts

Card image

Freezing of Bank Accounts by ED/GST/Police – Legal Remedies Explained

Has your bank account suddenly been frozen by the Enforcement Directorate, GST authorities, or police investigation? For businesses and individuals alike, a frozen bank account can bring operations to an immediate halt. Why Bank Accounts Are Frozen by Authorities Authorities ...

Card image

Stubble Burning One Reason For Delhi Air Pollution, Says CAQM; Supreme Court Seeks Affidavits From Punjab, Haryana, UP, Rajasthan

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (October 31) asked the Governments of Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan and Delhi to file affidavits setting forth the steps they have taken to control air pollution including the measures to curb crop burning. This ...

Card image

Understanding Overseas Patients' Rights in India: A Guide for International Visitors

Introduction:India has emerged as a popular destination for medical tourism, attracting patients from across the globe seeking high-quality healthcare services at affordable costs. While the country offers world-class medical facilities and skilled healthcare professionals, it's essential for overseas patients to ...

Card image

Documents Can Be Produced During Cross-Examination In Civil Trial To Confront Party To Suit Or Witness : Supreme Court

In a notable judgment, the Supreme Court has held that a document can produced during cross-examination in a civil trial to confront a party to the suit or a witness. The Court also held that there is no distinction between ...

Card image

Can’t Seek Immunity From Legal Provisions Because Contract In President’s Name: SC

Defending the Centre, ASG argued that the contract in the case stands on a different footing as it is entered into in the name of the President.The Union of India cannot demand an immunity from the operation of pertinent legal ...

Card image

Judicial Decorum vs. Legal Expression: Balancing Dissent with Discipline in India’s Courtrooms

🏛️ The Incident That Sparked a National Conversation The recent events in the Supreme Court of India have reignited a fundamental debate — where does a lawyer’s right to expression end and duty to maintain decorum begin? A courtroom is ...

EOS Chambers of Law

Speak With Our
Experts Today!

Get a Appointment
EOS Chambers of Law