The Supreme Court on Friday (13.10.2023), raised serious concerns over the delays in the adoption process and the potential impact on both aspiring parents and children in need of loving homes. The remarks came from a bench comprising CJI DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala, and Justice Manoj Misra during the hearing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking the simplification of adoption procedures in the country, filed by "The Temple of Healing," a charitable trust.
Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Aishwarya Bhati requested additional time to file a response to the PIL, which prompted Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud to express his apprehension. He raised questions about the delays in the adoption process, highlighting that it has virtually come to a standstill, leaving couples waiting for years.
The CJI further emphasised on the effects of bureaucratic delays on individuals and families. He asserted–"
Suppose someone wants to adopt at 35, they get delayed and now they are 39, 40, they may feel that it is too late to adopt. Parental position changes. We understand that possibly there is an element of misuse that you are apprehending but why are you stalling adoptions? There are hundreds and thousands of children waiting for adoption.
ASG Bhati responded by highlighting that there had been issues in identifying children available for adoption, suggesting that the court may want to provide for two more weeks.
Dr. Piyush Saxena (petitioner-in-person) appeared for the Temple of Healing. He highlighted that as per Section 56(3) of the Juvenile Justice (JJ) Act, the JJ Act did not apply to adoptions carried out under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act (HAMA), 1956. He argued that on the ground level, children were not being adopted as the officers in-charge of adoption for juveniles were being "doubly cautious".
The figure of 4000 adoptions against a figure of 3.1 crore children waiting to be adopted – these are not my figures, these are the figures of Parliamentary committee of the Rajya Sabha," he said.
Reiterating his submission, Saxena stated–
CJI asked–
Ms Bhati, you tell us how many children are being adopted...
The bench then stated that it will go through the written submissions in a greater detail. Eventually, the bench told the ASG that she had to "sit with CARA" and explain the consequences of the delay.
The matter will now be taken up on next Friday.
Defending the Centre ASG argued that the contract in the case stands on a different footing as it is entered into in the name of the President The Union of India cannot demand an immunity from the operation of pertinent...
Introduction The financial landscape for Non-Resident Indians NRIs is complex spanning a myriad of regulations taxes and investment opportunities As global citizens NRIs navigate diverse economic ecosystems balancing rights and responsibilities across borders In this article we delve into the...
India rsquo s judiciary is at a crossroads with digitization and judicial reforms paving the way for increased efficiency transparency and accessibility The e-Courts initiative launched by the Indian judiciary under the National e-Governance Plan NeGP is a transformative step...
As global business transactions increase so do the risks of cross-border disputes When parties from different countries find themselves in conflict traditional litigation can be slow costly and fraught with jurisdictional complexities This is where Alternative Dispute Resolution ADR mdash...
The Supreme Court on Tuesday November questioned the effectiveness of the Delhi Government's odd-even scheme in controlling air pollution while terming it as ldquo optics rdquo Under this scheme vehicles with license plate numbers ending in an even digit are...
The General Data Protection Regulation GDPR remains a cornerstone of data protection in the EU Since its implementation in several updates have refined its application addressing evolving data privacy concerns For solicitors understanding these changes is crucial for advising...