The Supreme Court of India has recently ordered the government to frame a policy on disaster management, including measures to prevent and respond to natural disasters such as floods, earthquakes, and cyclones. Background: The case originated from a petition filed by a group of activists who alleged that the government had failed to take adequate steps to prevent and respond to natural disasters. Parties: The petitioners were represented by advocate Sanjay Parikh, while the government was represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta. Legal issues: The main issue before the court was whether the government had a constitutional obligation to frame a policy on disaster management. Court observations: The court observed that the government had a constitutional obligation to protect the lives and property of citizens, and that a policy on disaster management was necessary to fulfill this obligation. The court also noted that the government had failed to take adequate steps to prevent and respond to natural disasters, and that a policy was necessary to ensure a coordinated and effective response. Significance: This judgment is significant as it highlights the need for a comprehensive policy on disaster management. The court's decision will have implications for the government's response to natural disasters and will likely influence the development of policies and practices related to disaster management. The judgment also underscores the importance of proactive measures to prevent and mitigate the impact of natural disasters, and the need for a coordinated and effective response to ensure the safety and well-being of citizens.