The Supreme Court of India has ruled that live-in partners are entitled to maintenance, provided they can prove that they were in a domestic relationship with their partner. Background: The case originated from a petition filed by a woman who claimed maintenance from her live-in partner. Parties: The petitioner, represented by senior advocate Indira Jaising, argued that she was entitled to maintenance as she was in a domestic relationship with her partner, while the respondent, represented by senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, contended that the petitioner was not entitled to maintenance as they were not married. Legal issues: The court examined the issue of maintenance for live-in partners and whether they were entitled to the same rights as married couples. Court observations: The Supreme Court observed that live-in relationships were increasingly common and that the law must recognize and protect the rights of individuals in such relationships. The court also noted that the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, applied to live-in relationships and that partners in such relationships were entitled to protection under the Act. Significance: The judgment is significant as it recognizes the rights of live-in partners and provides them with greater protection under the law. The court's ruling will have implications for the rights of individuals in live-in relationships and will also impact the concept of family and relationships in Indian society.