The Supreme Court of India has ordered an inquiry into the alleged misuse of Pegasus spyware, developed by Israeli firm NSO Group, to snoop on Indian citizens, including journalists, activists, and politicians. Background: The case originated from a petition filed by a group of journalists and activists who alleged that they were targeted by the spyware. Parties: The petitioners, represented by senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, argued that the government's alleged use of Pegasus spyware was a violation of their right to privacy, while the government, represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, contended that the allegations were baseless. Legal issues: The court examined the allegations of misuse of Pegasus spyware and whether the government was involved in the alleged snooping. Court observations: The Supreme Court observed that the allegations were serious and required a thorough investigation. The court also noted that the government's denial of any wrongdoing was not sufficient to allay concerns. Significance: The judgment is significant as it highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in the use of surveillance technology. The court's ruling will have implications for the government's ability to use spyware and other surveillance tools, and will also impact the rights of citizens to privacy and freedom of expression.