The Supreme Court of India has ordered a probe into the alleged misuse of Pegasus spyware to snoop on Indian citizens, including journalists, activists, and politicians. The court has appointed a three-member committee to investigate the allegations and submit a report within eight weeks. The committee will be headed by a retired Supreme Court judge and will include two technical experts. The court's decision comes after a batch of petitions were filed, alleging that the government had used Pegasus spyware to spy on Indian citizens without their consent. The petitioners had argued that the use of Pegasus spyware was a violation of the right to privacy, which is a fundamental right under the Indian Constitution. The government had denied the allegations, stating that it had not used Pegasus spyware to spy on Indian citizens. However, the court observed that the government's denial was not sufficient and that a probe was necessary to uncover the truth. The court's decision is significant as it highlights the importance of protecting the right to privacy in the digital age. The use of Pegasus spyware has been widely criticized, as it allows governments to access a person's phone and computer without their consent. The court's decision is expected to have implications for the government's surveillance policies and is likely to lead to a more transparent and accountable system. The probe will investigate whether the government had used Pegasus spyware to spy on Indian citizens and whether it had obtained the necessary permissions to do so. The committee will also examine whether the use of Pegasus spyware was in accordance with the Indian Telegraph Act and the Information Technology Act. The court's decision has been welcomed by civil society groups, which have been demanding a probe into the alleged misuse of Pegasus spyware. The judgment is a significant step towards protecting the right to privacy in India and is likely to have far-reaching implications for the country's surveillance policies. The Supreme Court's decision is a landmark judgment, which is expected to shape the future of surveillance policies in India. The court's decision is also expected to have implications for other countries, where similar allegations of surveillance have been made. The judgment is a significant victory for human rights activists, who have been demanding greater transparency and accountability in government surveillance policies. The Supreme Court's decision is a major step towards protecting human rights in India and is likely to have a positive impact on the country's democracy.