Background: The Sikkim High Court recently heard a petition filed by a group of individuals seeking to regulate tourism in the state. The petitioners argued that the lack of regulation had led to an increase in environmental degradation and cultural exploitation. Parties: The petitioners were represented by advocate D.K. Sharma, while the state government was represented by the Additional Advocate General, P. Wangdi. Legal issues: The primary issue before the court was whether the state government had a duty to regulate tourism and if so, what measures should be taken to ensure sustainable tourism practices. Court observations: The court observed that the state government had failed to take adequate measures to regulate tourism, despite the growing concern over environmental degradation and cultural exploitation. The court noted that the government had a duty to protect the environment and cultural heritage of the state. Significance: The Sikkim High Court's order is significant as it highlights the need for the government to regulate tourism. The court's directive to the state government to implement measures to regulate tourism is a step towards addressing the growing concern over environmental degradation and cultural exploitation. The order is also likely to have implications for other states in India, where tourism is a significant contributor to the economy. With the increasing importance of tourism in India, the need for regulation has become increasingly important to ensure sustainable tourism practices. The Sikkim High Court's order sets a precedent for other courts to follow in regulating tourism in India.