The Supreme Court of India has allowed passive euthanasia, with guidelines, in a landmark judgment. Background: The case arose from a petition filed by a non-governmental organization, seeking permission for passive euthanasia. Parties: The petitioners, including the NGO, argued that passive euthanasia was a right to die with dignity, while the respondents, including the Union of India, opposed the petition. Legal issues: The court examined whether passive euthanasia was constitutionally valid and what guidelines should be framed to regulate it. Court observations: The Supreme Court allowed passive euthanasia, with guidelines, observing that the right to die with dignity was a fundamental right. Significance: The judgment has significant implications for end-of-life care, emphasizing the need for a compassionate and dignified approach to dying.