Background: The Madras High Court has directed the Tamil Nadu government to fill up vacancies in the state consumer commission. Parties: The petition was filed by a consumer activist, who argued that the vacancies had been pending for a long time and that it was affecting the functioning of the commission. The respondents included the state government and the consumer commission. Legal issues: The main issue before the court was whether the state government had failed to fill up vacancies in the consumer commission. The court examined the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act and the rules framed under it. Court observations: The court observed that the state government had failed to fill up vacancies in the consumer commission and that it was affecting the functioning of the commission. The court noted that it was the duty of the government to ensure that the commission was functioning properly and that the vacancies were filled up at the earliest. Significance: The order is significant as it highlights the importance of filling up vacancies in the consumer commission. The case emphasizes the need for the state government to ensure that the commission is functioning properly and that consumers are able to get justice. The court's decision is also a reminder of the importance of ensuring that the consumer commission is able to function independently and effectively.