Background: The Supreme Court of India recently heard a petition challenging the Constitution (103rd Amendment) Act, 2019, which provides for 10% reservation for economically weaker sections (EWS) in government jobs and educational institutions. The petitioners argued that the amendment was unconstitutional and that it would lead to reverse discrimination. Parties: The petitioners were a group of individuals and organizations, including the Janhit Abhiyan, while the respondents were the Union of India and the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment. Legal issues: The main issue before the court was whether the amendment was unconstitutional and whether it would lead to reverse discrimination. Court observations: The Supreme Court observed that the amendment is constitutionally valid and that it does not lead to reverse discrimination. The court dismissed the petition and upheld the amendment. Significance: The judgment is significant as it upholds the constitutionality of the amendment and paves the way for the implementation of the 10% reservation for EWS. The judgment will have implications for the government's ability to provide reservation to EWS and will impact the lives of millions of individuals who belong to EWS.