The Supreme Court of India has ruled that passive euthanasia is legally permissible, allowing individuals to withdraw life-sustaining treatment in certain circumstances. Background: The case originated from a petition filed by a non-governmental organization, which sought clarification on the legality of passive euthanasia. Parties: The petitioners argued that individuals have the right to die with dignity and that passive euthanasia is a necessary option for those suffering from terminal illnesses. The respondents, including the Union of India, contended that passive euthanasia is not explicitly permitted under Indian law. Legal issues: The court examined the concept of passive euthanasia, its distinction from active euthanasia, and the need for a legal framework to regulate end-of-life care. Court observations: The Supreme Court held that passive euthanasia is permissible in cases where the individual is suffering from a terminal illness and has no chance of recovery. The court laid down guidelines for the implementation of passive euthanasia, including the requirement for informed consent and the involvement of medical professionals. Significance: The judgment has significant implications for end-of-life care in India, recognizing the right of individuals to die with dignity and autonomy. The court's decision is expected to influence the development of palliative care and the regulation of euthanasia in India.