The Supreme Court of India has ordered protection for whistleblowers, in a judgment that has significant implications for the fight against corruption. Background: The case originated from a petition filed by a whistleblower, who argued that he was being harassed and threatened for exposing corruption. Parties: The petitioner argued that he was entitled to protection, as he had exposed corruption and was facing retaliation. The respondents, including the Union of India, contended that the petitioner was not entitled to protection, as he had not followed the proper procedures for reporting corruption. Legal issues: The court examined whether whistleblowers were entitled to protection, and if so, what measures should be taken to protect them. Court observations: The Supreme Court ordered protection for whistleblowers, and directed the government to take measures to protect them from harassment and retaliation. The court observed that whistleblowers played a crucial role in exposing corruption, and that it was necessary to protect them to promote transparency and accountability. Significance: The judgment has significant implications for the fight against corruption, particularly in the context of whistleblower protection. The court's order for protection of whistleblowers will help to promote transparency and accountability, and provide a safe and secure environment for individuals to report corruption.