The Supreme Court of India has set aside a Gujarat High Court order, which had directed the state government to consider vaccinating all citizens against COVID-19. Background: The case began with a PIL filed by a lawyer, seeking directions for the vaccination of all citizens in Gujarat. Parties: The petitioner was the lawyer, while the respondents included the state of Gujarat and others. Legal issues: The primary issue was whether the high court had the power to direct the state government to vaccinate all citizens. Court observations: The court observed that the high court had overstepped its jurisdiction and that the issue of vaccination was a policy decision that fell within the domain of the executive. Significance: This judgment highlights the importance of respecting the separation of powers between the judiciary, legislature, and executive. The Supreme Court's decision will help to maintain the balance of power and ensure that the judiciary does not overstep its bounds.