UPSC CSE: No Interim Relief, Delhi High Court Asks CAT To Ex

Card image

UPSC CSE: No Interim Relief, Delhi High Court Asks CAT To Expeditiously Decide On Plea To Lower CSAT Cut-Off

By Team EOS |

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday asked the Central Administrative Tribunal to decide expeditiously the Plea  seeking reduction in the cut off from 33% to 23% for qualifying Part II (CSAT) exam of 2023 Civil Services Examination conducted by UPSC last month.

A vacation bench of Justice C Hari Shankar and Justice Manoj Jain  refused the interim relief and disposed of a moved by a group of civil services aspirants against the Tribunal’s refusal to grant any interim relief.

“The Central Administrative Tribunal is requested to decide OA as expeditiously as possible. Needless to say, keeping in accordance with principles of natural justice. The petition is disposed of,” the court ordered.

On June 09, the CAT had issued notice on the plea seeking reduction in the cut off but refused any interim relief and listed the matter for hearing on July 06.

The candidates then moved the High Court submitting that the matter before the Tribunal will become infructuous by July 06. It was prayed that the UPSC be restrained from acting any further on the prelims results declared on June 12.

During the hearing today, Advocate Saaket Jain representing the petitioners took the court through the examination notification issued by the UPSC on February 01 and referred to the syllabus mentioned therein.

“The Tribunal has not thrown out your case. It has issued notice on your OA. The matter is now listed on July 06. Your prayer… no court will pass an order staying the entire CSE 2023. It is an ex facie prayer which cannot be granted. There are plethora of judgments of Supreme Court,” the bench said.

It added: “Even if you are… because a stay is granted not only on a prima facie case and balance of convenience… Given the fact that even if hundreds of students go to court, the balance of convenience can never be on staying appointments. There are decisions which say that courts should not look on question papers.“

As Jain submitted that he was not touching upon the merits of the case and was only showing why the matter deserves an interim relief, Justice Shankar orally said: “You are taking us through the notification. Then we will address it, then we will see whether questions are below syllabus. In a vacation bench we are doing it… you have started by going through syallabus, what is it if not merits?”

The court then disposed of the matter after Jain requested the court to pass an order directing the CAT to decide the case expeditiously. The prayer was not opposed by Advocate Naresh Kaushik who appeared for UPSC.

The petition before the High Court said that the matter affects lakhs of students across the country. “Since the result for the same has been declared on 12.06.2023, it is necessary that this matter be heard at the earliest,” it added.

Source

Latest News

Latest Posts

Card image

Navigating the Latest GDPR Updates: What Solicitors Need to Know

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) remains a cornerstone of data protection in the EU. Since its implementation in 2018, several updates have refined its application, addressing evolving data privacy concerns. For solicitors, understanding these changes is crucial for advising ...

Card image

An In-Depth Look at Environmental and Sustainability Law

In today's rapidly changing world, environmental and sustainability law has become a cornerstone of global legal practices. With increasing awareness of climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation, these laws are essential for promoting sustainable development and protecting our planet ...

Card image

Supreme Court Says MP, MLA Can’t Claim Immunity From Prosecution On Charges Of Bribery

The seven-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court said it disagreed with the judgment in PV Narasimha and the judgment in PV Narasimha which grants immunity to legislators for allegedly bribery for casting a vote or speech has “wide ramifications ...

Card image

5 Mistakes People Make While Buying Property in India

Buying property is one of the biggest financial decisions in India.But are you sure you are not making a mistake that could cost you years of litigation or financial loss? Many buyers focus only on location and price, while ignoring ...

Card image

AI and Big Data in Legal Case Management

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and big data into legal case management is revolutionizing the way law firms and legal professionals operate. These technologies offer unprecedented opportunities to streamline processes, enhance decision-making, and improve client outcomes. The Role of ...

Card image

Understanding Section 11: Why Minors Cannot Contract | Know the Law

📘 Can a Minor Enter Into a Contract? ❌ Absolutely Not.As per Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a person must be of the age of majority (i.e., 18 years or 21 in certain guardianship cases) to enter ...

EOS Chambers of Law

Speak With Our
Experts Today!

Get a Appointment
EOS Chambers of Law