Can’t Seek Immunity From Legal Provisions Because Contract
Can’t Seek Immunity From Legal Provisions Because Contract In President’s Name: SC
|
Defending the Centre, ASG argued that the contract in the case stands on a different footing as it is entered into in the name of the President.
The Union of India cannot demand an immunity from the operation of pertinent legal provisions just because a contract is in the name of the President of India, the Supreme Court ruled on Friday.
A bench, comprising Chief Justice of India Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and justices PS Narasimha and JB Pardiwala, interpreted Article 299 of the Constitution to hold that the central government, as a party to a contract, cannot wriggle out of statutory bars by arguing that the contract is in the name of the President of India.
Article 299 provides that all contracts in the exercise of the executive power of the union or of a State shall be expressed to be made by the President or by the Governor of the State, and all such contracts will be executed by a person duly authorized in that behalf.
“Having considered the purpose and object of Article 299, we are of the clear opinion that a contract entered into in the name of the President of India, cannot and will not create an immunity against the application of any statutory prescription imposing conditions on parties to an agreement, when the Government chooses to enter into a contract,” held the judgment, authored by justice Narasimha.
Post Categories
Featured Posts
Latest Posts
Latest Posts
Cross-Border Succession Planning: What Global Indian Families Must Fix in 2026
Protecting Wealth Across Borders Requires More Than Just a Will. Global Indian families are increasingly building wealth beyond geographical boundaries. A business in India, investment portfolios in the UAE, real estate in the UK, children settled in the United States, ...
S. 50 NDPS Act Not Applicable To Recovery From Bag Carried By A Person: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court recently reiterated that the conditions for personal search as specified in Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act are applicable only for the search of the physical body of the person and not for ...
Supreme Court Stays High Court Order On Old Pension Scheme For Paramilitary Forces
The Supreme Court on Friday stayed the Delhi High Court judgment which held that the old pension scheme (OPS) will be implemented in the Central Paramilitary Forces (CAPF). During a brief hearing, a bench of Justices Sanjeev Khanna and Bela ...
SC Issues Notice On PIL Seeking Action Against Doctors Who Do Not Prescribe Generic Medicines
The plea said that affordability of medicines is a vital factor that contributes to effective healthcare delivery and the realization of the ‘right to health’ The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice on a PIL seeking disciplinary actions against doctors ...
AI and Big Data in Legal Case Management
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and big data into legal case management is revolutionizing the way law firms and legal professionals operate. These technologies offer unprecedented opportunities to streamline processes, enhance decision-making, and improve client outcomes. The Role of ...
Members Of Railway Protection Force Can Seek Benefit Under Employees Compensation Act Though RPF Declared As An Armed Force: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court on Monday (26.09.2023), held that an officer of the Railway Protection Force (RPF) can seek compensation under Employees Compensation Act, 1923 even though the RPF has been declared to be an armed force of the Union. “..in ...
Speak With Our
Get a Appointment