Can’t Seek Immunity From Legal Provisions Because Contract
Can’t Seek Immunity From Legal Provisions Because Contract In President’s Name: SC
|
Defending the Centre, ASG argued that the contract in the case stands on a different footing as it is entered into in the name of the President.
The Union of India cannot demand an immunity from the operation of pertinent legal provisions just because a contract is in the name of the President of India, the Supreme Court ruled on Friday.
A bench, comprising Chief Justice of India Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and justices PS Narasimha and JB Pardiwala, interpreted Article 299 of the Constitution to hold that the central government, as a party to a contract, cannot wriggle out of statutory bars by arguing that the contract is in the name of the President of India.
Article 299 provides that all contracts in the exercise of the executive power of the union or of a State shall be expressed to be made by the President or by the Governor of the State, and all such contracts will be executed by a person duly authorized in that behalf.
“Having considered the purpose and object of Article 299, we are of the clear opinion that a contract entered into in the name of the President of India, cannot and will not create an immunity against the application of any statutory prescription imposing conditions on parties to an agreement, when the Government chooses to enter into a contract,” held the judgment, authored by justice Narasimha.
Post Categories
Featured Posts
Latest Posts
Latest Posts
Protecting Your Rights in Family Law Matters: Legal Solutions for NRIs ⚖️
Navigating family law matters can be especially challenging for Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) who may face unique legal complexities. Whether dealing with divorce, child custody, or property disputes, understanding your rights and available legal solutions is crucial. Here are some key ...
Supreme Court Sides With Madras HC: Person Forwarding Social Media Messages Liable For Contents
The Madras High Court had noted that Shekher was a person of high stature and had many followers. It stated that he should have exercised more caution when forwarding messages. The Supreme Court refused to entertain an appeal challenging Madras ...
𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐋𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐃𝐮𝐞 𝐃𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐂𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐁𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐀𝐧𝐲 𝐁𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐌𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐫
Why Legal Due Diligence is Crucial Before Any Business Merger 📢 Planning a merger or acquisition? Don’t skip legal due diligence—it can make or break the deal! Here’s why: 🔎 What is Legal Due Diligence?It’s a comprehensive review of a ...
Motor Accident Claims | No Right To Recovery For Insurer Merely Because Vehicle Owner Didn't Verify Driver's License : Supreme Court
The Supreme Court on Monday (30th October) held that an insurance company cannot claim that it is not liable to pay compensation in a motor vehicle accident claim just because the vehicle owner did not verify the genuineness of the ...
E-Courts: The Future of Judiciary in India
India’s judiciary is at a crossroads, with digitization and judicial reforms paving the way for increased efficiency, transparency, and accessibility. The e-Courts initiative, launched by the Indian judiciary under the National e-Governance Plan (NeGP), is a transformative step toward modernizing ...
🏠 𝐋𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐂𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐤𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐁𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐧 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐄𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 (2025 𝐄𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧)
𝐍𝐑𝐈 𝐨𝐫 𝐇𝐍𝐈? 𝐃𝐨𝐧’𝐭 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐖𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐞 7 𝐋𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐂𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐤𝐬! Real estate remains one of the most trusted investment avenues for 𝐍𝐑𝐈𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐇𝐍𝐈𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚. But with rising frauds, title disputes, and compliance issues—a beautiful property can become a ...
Speak With Our
Get a Appointment