Defending the Centre, ASG argued that the contract in the case stands on a different footing as it is entered into in the name of the President.
The Union of India cannot demand an immunity from the operation of pertinent legal provisions just because a contract is in the name of the President of India, the Supreme Court ruled on Friday.
A bench, comprising Chief Justice of India Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and justices PS Narasimha and JB Pardiwala, interpreted Article 299 of the Constitution to hold that the central government, as a party to a contract, cannot wriggle out of statutory bars by arguing that the contract is in the name of the President of India.
Article 299 provides that all contracts in the exercise of the executive power of the union or of a State shall be expressed to be made by the President or by the Governor of the State, and all such contracts will be executed by a person duly authorized in that behalf.
“Having considered the purpose and object of Article 299, we are of the clear opinion that a contract entered into in the name of the President of India, cannot and will not create an immunity against the application of any statutory prescription imposing conditions on parties to an agreement, when the Government chooses to enter into a contract,” held the judgment, authored by justice Narasimha.
Estate Planning and Succession Laws for NRIs A Comprehensive Guide Estate planning is not just a necessity it's a critical step in securing your family rsquo s future ensuring the seamless transfer of assets and minimizing legal complications For Non-Resident...
Introduction Non-Resident Indian NRI marriages while often joyous can also bring a unique set of legal challenges These challenges stem from cross-border legal systems differing cultural expectations and complex family dynamics Understanding these issues is crucial for NRIs and their...
The Supreme Court on Friday September pronounced a judgment recognizing the rights of children born out of invalid marriages in their parents rsquo share in Hindu joint family property The Court held that children born out of void voidable marriages...
The Supreme Court on Friday September granted relief to three judicial service aspirants from Bihar whose candidatures were rejected by the Bihar Public Service Commission BPSC due to non-production of original certificates at the time of interview Holding that production...
A Division Bench of the Supreme Court while allowing a bail plea held that the grant of bail to a co-accused person cannot be contingent on the surrender of another accused who is also pertinently the main accused in the...