Can’t Seek Immunity From Legal Provisions Because Contract
Can’t Seek Immunity From Legal Provisions Because Contract In President’s Name: SC
|
Defending the Centre, ASG argued that the contract in the case stands on a different footing as it is entered into in the name of the President.
The Union of India cannot demand an immunity from the operation of pertinent legal provisions just because a contract is in the name of the President of India, the Supreme Court ruled on Friday.
A bench, comprising Chief Justice of India Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and justices PS Narasimha and JB Pardiwala, interpreted Article 299 of the Constitution to hold that the central government, as a party to a contract, cannot wriggle out of statutory bars by arguing that the contract is in the name of the President of India.
Article 299 provides that all contracts in the exercise of the executive power of the union or of a State shall be expressed to be made by the President or by the Governor of the State, and all such contracts will be executed by a person duly authorized in that behalf.
“Having considered the purpose and object of Article 299, we are of the clear opinion that a contract entered into in the name of the President of India, cannot and will not create an immunity against the application of any statutory prescription imposing conditions on parties to an agreement, when the Government chooses to enter into a contract,” held the judgment, authored by justice Narasimha.
Post Categories
Featured Posts
Latest Posts
Latest Posts
'Serving Personnel Can't Be Deemed To Ex-Servicemen From Future Date' : Supreme Court Rejects Army Veterans Plea For Govt Job
Serving Armed Forces officers can't be deemed to be Ex-Servicemen from a prospective date, said the Supreme Court while rejecting the claim of three appellants for appointments as Village Development Officers in the Uttar Pradesh State Service. The appellants, even ...
Judicial Decorum vs. Legal Expression: Balancing Dissent with Discipline in India’s Courtrooms
🏛️ The Incident That Sparked a National Conversation The recent events in the Supreme Court of India have reignited a fundamental debate — where does a lawyer’s right to expression end and duty to maintain decorum begin? A courtroom is ...
E-Courts: The Future of Judiciary in India
India’s judiciary is at a crossroads, with digitization and judicial reforms paving the way for increased efficiency, transparency, and accessibility. The e-Courts initiative, launched by the Indian judiciary under the National e-Governance Plan (NeGP), is a transformative step toward modernizing ...
ADR in Workplace Conflicts: A Guide for Employers and Employees
Workplace conflicts are inevitable. Whether stemming from miscommunication, differences in expectations, or interpersonal issues, they can disrupt the professional environment and affect productivity. For both employers and employees, finding a way to resolve these conflicts quickly, fairly, and cost-effectively is ...
Law's Outcome Depends On Who Wields The Law In Their Hands : CJI DY Chandrachud
Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud recently spoke on how justice and the outcome of the law depends on who is wielding the law in their hands. When the law is wielded with compassion, it is capable of producing justice, ...
S.106 Transfer Of Property Act | Onus On Tenant To Prove That Premises Was Leased For Manufacturing Purpose: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court Bench comprising Justice Aniruddha Bose and Justice Vikram Nath, has held that in order to attract the application of Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, which requires 6 months’ notice for termination of lease, ...
Speak With Our
Get a Appointment