Can’t Seek Immunity From Legal Provisions Because Contract
Can’t Seek Immunity From Legal Provisions Because Contract In President’s Name: SC
|
Defending the Centre, ASG argued that the contract in the case stands on a different footing as it is entered into in the name of the President.
The Union of India cannot demand an immunity from the operation of pertinent legal provisions just because a contract is in the name of the President of India, the Supreme Court ruled on Friday.
A bench, comprising Chief Justice of India Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and justices PS Narasimha and JB Pardiwala, interpreted Article 299 of the Constitution to hold that the central government, as a party to a contract, cannot wriggle out of statutory bars by arguing that the contract is in the name of the President of India.
Article 299 provides that all contracts in the exercise of the executive power of the union or of a State shall be expressed to be made by the President or by the Governor of the State, and all such contracts will be executed by a person duly authorized in that behalf.
“Having considered the purpose and object of Article 299, we are of the clear opinion that a contract entered into in the name of the President of India, cannot and will not create an immunity against the application of any statutory prescription imposing conditions on parties to an agreement, when the Government chooses to enter into a contract,” held the judgment, authored by justice Narasimha.
Post Categories
Featured Posts
Latest Posts
Latest Posts
Navigating the Complexities of Corporate & Commercial Laws: Key Considerations for Businesses
In today's dynamic business landscape, understanding and complying with corporate and commercial laws are paramount for organizations aiming to thrive and expand. From formation and governance to contractual relationships and regulatory compliance, adherence to legal frameworks is essential for maintaining ...
The Supreme Court’s Ruling on Same-Sex Marriage: What’s Next?
As legal professionals, we recognize the profound implications of the Supreme Court of India's recent deliberations on same-sex marriage. While the Court refrained from granting full marriage equality, the discussions have paved the way for significant legal discourse on LGBTQ+ ...
Navigating Real Estate Challenges: A Solicitor's Insight
Introduction: In the intricate world of real estate, consumers often find themselves entangled in a web of complexities that demand legal acumen and guidance. As a solicitor passionate about serving my clients, I feel compelled to shed light on the ...
Empowering Dispute Resolution: How Technology is Shaping the Future of ADR
🎯 The Role of Technology in Enhancing ADR Processes The advent of technology has transformed virtually every industry, and the field of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is no exception. ADR processes, including mediation, arbitration, and negotiation, have traditionally relied on ...
Dowry Death Case | Supreme Court Surprised At HC Using Same Dying Declaration To Convict Husband While Disbelieving It For Father-in-Law
The Supreme Court, while acquitting a convict in a dowry death case, emphasized the critical importance of ensuring that a dying declaration is trustworthy and reliable, and inspires confidence when it is considered the sole basis for a criminal conviction. ...
BREAKING| Supreme Court Issues Fresh Guidelines For Senior Designation; Previous Applicants Required To Update Or Submit Fresh Applications
The Supreme Court has issued fresh guidelines for the designation of senior advocates following the May 12 judgment in Indira Jaising vs Supreme Court which modified the criteria for senior designation. The Court has directed that Advocates-on-Record/Advocates who had applied in response ...
Speak With Our
Get a Appointment