Can’t Seek Immunity From Legal Provisions Because Contract
Can’t Seek Immunity From Legal Provisions Because Contract In President’s Name: SC
|
Defending the Centre, ASG argued that the contract in the case stands on a different footing as it is entered into in the name of the President.
The Union of India cannot demand an immunity from the operation of pertinent legal provisions just because a contract is in the name of the President of India, the Supreme Court ruled on Friday.
A bench, comprising Chief Justice of India Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and justices PS Narasimha and JB Pardiwala, interpreted Article 299 of the Constitution to hold that the central government, as a party to a contract, cannot wriggle out of statutory bars by arguing that the contract is in the name of the President of India.
Article 299 provides that all contracts in the exercise of the executive power of the union or of a State shall be expressed to be made by the President or by the Governor of the State, and all such contracts will be executed by a person duly authorized in that behalf.
“Having considered the purpose and object of Article 299, we are of the clear opinion that a contract entered into in the name of the President of India, cannot and will not create an immunity against the application of any statutory prescription imposing conditions on parties to an agreement, when the Government chooses to enter into a contract,” held the judgment, authored by justice Narasimha.
Post Categories
Featured Posts
Latest Posts
Latest Posts
An In-Depth Look at Environmental and Sustainability Law
In today's rapidly changing world, environmental and sustainability law has become a cornerstone of global legal practices. With increasing awareness of climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation, these laws are essential for promoting sustainable development and protecting our planet ...
Recruitment Process -Last Date To Fulfil Eligibility Criteria Is Last Date To Submit Applications, In The Absence Of Any Specific Rule: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court emphasized that where there is an absence of any specific rule or prescription, the last day for fulfilling eligibility is the last date of submission of the application. The Court made the observation while refusing the benefit ...
Section 313 CrPC | 'Right To Remain Silent Not Be Used Against Accused' : Supreme Court Summarises 12 Principles
Recently, the Supreme Court, in a noteworthy judgment, while acquitting a woman accused of killing her own child and was convicted for murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, also decided the question of what may be required of the convict ...
Adolescent Privacy Rights: A Critical Issue in India’s Evolving Digital Landscape
The rapid advancement of technology has transformed the lives of adolescents in India, providing unprecedented access to information, social connectivity, and learning tools. However, this digital revolution has also created a complex challenge—safeguarding the privacy of adolescents who are increasingly ...
Empowering NRIs with Insights into Taxes, Investments, and Banking Regulations
Introduction: The financial landscape for Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) is complex, spanning a myriad of regulations, taxes, and investment opportunities. As global citizens, NRIs navigate diverse economic ecosystems, balancing rights and responsibilities across borders. In this article, we delve into the ...
Can’t Seek Immunity From Legal Provisions Because Contract In President’s Name: SC
Defending the Centre, ASG argued that the contract in the case stands on a different footing as it is entered into in the name of the President.The Union of India cannot demand an immunity from the operation of pertinent legal ...
Speak With Our
Get a Appointment