Can’t Seek Immunity From Legal Provisions Because Contract
Can’t Seek Immunity From Legal Provisions Because Contract In President’s Name: SC
|
Defending the Centre, ASG argued that the contract in the case stands on a different footing as it is entered into in the name of the President.
The Union of India cannot demand an immunity from the operation of pertinent legal provisions just because a contract is in the name of the President of India, the Supreme Court ruled on Friday.
A bench, comprising Chief Justice of India Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and justices PS Narasimha and JB Pardiwala, interpreted Article 299 of the Constitution to hold that the central government, as a party to a contract, cannot wriggle out of statutory bars by arguing that the contract is in the name of the President of India.
Article 299 provides that all contracts in the exercise of the executive power of the union or of a State shall be expressed to be made by the President or by the Governor of the State, and all such contracts will be executed by a person duly authorized in that behalf.
“Having considered the purpose and object of Article 299, we are of the clear opinion that a contract entered into in the name of the President of India, cannot and will not create an immunity against the application of any statutory prescription imposing conditions on parties to an agreement, when the Government chooses to enter into a contract,” held the judgment, authored by justice Narasimha.
Post Categories
Featured Posts
Latest Posts
Latest Posts
Petition Against IIT Eligibility Criteria Of 75% In Class 12 Dismissed
A vacation bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and K V Vishwanathan said this prerequisite existed earlier as well and it was not inclined to intervene in the matter. New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a plea challenging the ...
The Future of Legal Ethics in the Digital Age
The legal profession has never remained static. From handwritten pleadings to electronic filing, from physical libraries to digital legal databases, every generation has witnessed transformation in the practice of law. Today, however, the profession stands before perhaps its most significant ...
Permanent Establishment (PE) Risk for Foreign Companies in India – 2026 Compliance Alert
Introduction: Why PE Risk Is a Serious Compliance Issue in 2026 India continues to witness heightened scrutiny of foreign companies operating through subsidiaries, employees, consultants, and digital presence. With increased data sharing, GST intelligence, and income-tax investigations, Permanent Establishment (PE) ...
Dividend Income From Indian Entity's Establishment In Oman Having ‘Permanent Establishment’ Status Under DTAA Not Taxable In India: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has held that if an Indian Entity’s Establishment is operating in Oman and has a ‘Permanent Establishment’ status under Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (“DTAA”), then the dividend income received by the Indian Entity from such Establishment would ...
Law's Outcome Depends On Who Wields The Law In Their Hands : CJI DY Chandrachud
Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud recently spoke on how justice and the outcome of the law depends on who is wielding the law in their hands. When the law is wielded with compassion, it is capable of producing justice, ...
Repatriation of Funds: Guidelines for NRIs
Navigating the repatriation of funds as a Non-Resident Indian (NRI) can be complex, but understanding the guidelines can simplify the process and ensure compliance with Indian regulations. Here's a comprehensive overview to help NRIs manage their finances effectively. 1️⃣ ...
Speak With Our
Get a Appointment